A report written for MPs by Christopher Barclay, a research specialist in the House of Commons Library, has been released today which acknowledges the need to reduce meat and dairy consumption.
A section titled ‘Are diet changes needed?’ in the report ‘How UK farmers could reduce greenhouse gas emissions’ describes the finding of two important studies regarding meat consumption. The section is reproduced below.
“A report in 2008 from Tara Garnett of the Food Climate Research Unit at the University of Surrey assessed GHG emissions from the UK’s agricultural production, food processing and distribution sectors. It concluded that while technical change would partially reduce the food and agriculture sector’s contribution to GHG emissions, only a radical change in food consumption in Europe and other developed countries would make any major difference. The report calculated that the meat and dairy sectors together accounted for over half of total food sector emissions. A vegetarian diet including milk was not necessarily less GHG-intensive than a meat-based diet.
A German report reached a similar conclusion. Agriculture was emitting almost as much GHG as road traffic in Germany, and if consumers wanted to see this output fall, the best thing they could do would be to reduce their consumption of milk and beef – particularly organic beef.
Consumers often believe that they are benefiting the climate by choosing organic products, but this is not always the case, the researchers found. For example, organic crop production can emit up to 60% more CO2 than non-organic. Organic crop production is some 60% lower in greenhouse gas emissions, due to the avoidance of artificial fertilisers, and if all German agriculture were converted to organic, there would be a 15-20% drop in emissions. However, this is not a practical possibility as it would require 70% more land – some 10m hectares – which is not available either in Germany or Europe.
The report stresses the need to reduce consumption of milk and beef. In addition:
The biggest contribution to reducing CO2 emissions, however, would be to restore German wetlands which have been dried out and used for farming. These areas account for over 30% of all agricultural emissions, although they occupy only 8% of the total agricultural area. Organic farming has a greater detrimental effect in these areas because it uses more land per kilogram of food produced. ”
The big question is, what’s this report for? Who will read it and what will the outcomes be? It’s fanstastic news that more and more people are finally acknowledging that a massive reduction in meat and dairy is necessary to make a real impact on the carbon footprint of the agricultural sector, but words are not enough, when will there be some action? When I find out, I’ll let you know!



April 2nd, 2009 at 6:29 am
“The biggest contribution to reducing CO2 emissions, however, would be to restore German wetlands which have been dried out and used for farming”
BINGO! EU estimates of GHG from livestock have been omitting CO2, like the US EPA reports because they don’t believe livestock’s land-use changes are very significant.
Great study to know about, thank you Sophie.
June 18th, 2009 at 6:23 am
Well, veggies and fruit are also energy intensive. Further, all perishables (vegs and protein based) need refrigeration.
And refrigeration is not going away in a hurry: about 300 million tonnes of produce are wasted annually due to deficient refrigeration worldwide. Also, global warming means that food chains will depend more on refrigeration in the future, to maintain quality and safety standards.Fruit and vegs safety will become even more important, due to its strong link with product temperatures during storage and transport.
So, it is not as simple as stopping eating meat, really.
Cheers,
June 19th, 2009 at 3:11 pm
Hi Silvia,
Thanks for your comment. Of course, if you stop eating meat and dairy and then live off fruit and vegetables that have been imported vast distances to your table, then yes, that is not a solution to environmental destruction!
However, studies have shown that reducing meat consumption is far more effective in reducing our impact on the environment than simply eating local or organic:-
http://www.foodforchange.org.uk/2008/04/forget-eat-local-go-vegan/ and http://www.foodforchange.org.uk/2009/02/organicorintensivefarming/
Meat also requires vast amounts more water:-
http://www.foodforchange.org.uk/2008/07/wheres-all-our-water-gone/
http://www.foodforchange.org.uk/2008/07/save-water-go-vegan/
So yes, going vegan is not the whole answer, but it is the most significant change we can make in our diets for the benefit of the planet, and all those who live on it.
Thanks,
Sophie